Contract Could Derail Liquor Store Privatization
The state stores’ 3,500 union employees have a new contract.
A new contract for union employees in liquor stores across the state could stall or even kill current efforts to remove liquor and wine sales from the hands of the state of Pennsylvania.
The new contract for 3,500 employees runs through June 2015, according to Philly.com, and the union says one provision requires any private company that would buy the state stores to hire and pay union employees the same salary until the end of the contract.
A spokesman for Gov. Tom Corbett, who campaigned on privatizing the state stores, told Businessweek that private businesses cannot be made to honor contracts covering state employees.
What do you think? Should private businesses have to honor a contract they didn’t make? Should liquor stores be privatized? Tell us in the comments.
citizenknow
3:03 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
No, unions and government waste are what is wrong with the stores anyway.
bigben
5:08 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Of course they should be privatized. Or let the state stores and employees compete with private stores.It's called free enterprise.
Tony Ercole
7:46 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
We all know the outcome! For the majority, it would save us gasoline and sales tax from driving to Namaans Rd. FREE ENTERPRISE! Got it?
Gil Zimmerman
8:01 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Another reason Pennsylvania needs to follow Wisconsin's lead. Get the State out of liquor sales. Stop patronage and back room deals. Write your state reps and senators and don't re-elect those who don't vote for privatization.
Charlie D.
9:37 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Best of all worlds would be to let private liquor stores compete with State Stores....and watch the unions and state stores go bankrupt!! Would be further proof that government has no idea how to run anything! And I mean anything.
Larry S
9:43 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
It might also be time to think about getting rid of the State monopoly featuring dirty sheds and grim clerks selling cases of warm beer. What a farce!
Ken Ezzell
9:57 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Of course, they should be required to honor a legal contract. In a free enterprise system, it will be reflected in the fair price they are willing to pay for the stores. What surprises me is the number of people who don't seem to know how free enterprise is supposed to work, and that where contracts are not enforced, or bend to political pressure, markets collapse.
Francine Goldberg
10:53 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Thank you, Ken! A voice of intelligence and reason. Obviously many posting here know nothing about contracts and law.
Of course, I worked in the state stores when I was 21. I'm now considerably older. And this talk has been happening since I was a teenager. So, nothing much has changed in those 40 years. Except that the stores are nicer and have a much better selection, especially in wine.
I just don't understand all this anti-union sentiment I see now. Without unions, you wouldn't have a 40-hr workweek or weekends. People need to know their history before they open their mouths.
Lucy Bennett
1:17 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Francine, unions aside, do you think the government should run liquor stores in Pennsylvania or should leave that up to private business? As a former employee, what is your opinion?
Francine Goldberg
3:28 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Lucy, I only worked there for about six months after I graduated from college and much has changed in those decades. And now that I'm much older, my opinions have changed in many ways. So, to answer your question, unions aside, no, I don't think the state should be in that business. However, I believe that the states do a better job at the required regulations in keeping underaged kids from buying liquor. So there can be a place for them. I don't think that private enterprise is *ALWAYS* the answer.
Ike
10:54 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
If you worked for the state store . you wounldnt be witching.
Apuch
10:57 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012
I am generally in favor of unions when they help. I see no need to have a union to sell liquor from a State controlled system. I have yet to meet a State store employee who knew anything about the product beyond if it was in stock or not. Restaurants are hurt most by the limited selection of wines available and this hurts Philadelphia when compared to other cities. I think this contract is a desperate attempt of the union to put off the inevitable privatization of this product.
Francine Goldberg
3:30 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
The union at the PLCB is the Retail Clerks Union, and they are the union in your supermarkets and department stores also. So, while the privitization of the PLCB would reduce their membership, it won't "kill" that union. You should be aware of this before you post.
Jim
12:20 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
I have always found the state store employees very helpful. I travel a lot and depend on knowing where to find something. Pennslyvania state store employees have always saved me time and money. The price of any item in a Pa. state store, is the same as any store in Delaware, except Tri- State. It cost ten dollars to get there,unless your buying in bulk. The bigger state stores in Pa. have a better selection, then anybody, especially when it comes to fine wine. So APuck if you want good price. good service and a wide selection, stick with a well paid happy employee, who knows what thier doing, not some undocumanted counter person in Delaware, for the same price.
Francine Goldberg
3:32 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Not to mention that it it against the law to buy liquor in a neighboring state and then cross the border and bring it into PA. Don't let the state police trail you from the liquor store.
A. Friend
1:25 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
"A spokesman for Gov. Tom Corbett, who campaigned on privatizing the state stores, told Businessweek that private businesses cannot be made to honor contracts covering state employees."
Not sure I follow. Sure, the new labor contract can't directly obligate private companies. But it can prevent the state from selling off its liquor stores to private companies unless the state obligates the private companies, as a condition of the sale, to retain the store employees at their current salary.
David Curran
4:17 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Privatizing the liquor stores, I am not sure. The PA issue I have a problem with is, the beverage dealers and bars So many states let you buy individual 6-packs at convience stores. Who amongst us has not had to run around, and pay dearly for beer from a bar or pizza place. Just a screwy law that reeks of special interest.
Jim
5:06 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
David, I am sure you must have a beer distributor around your residence. Buy a case of beer, or a keg and keep it cold. By the time a convience store gets your case of beer, it's been handled so many times,and gone thru more tempatures changes then a 55 year old woman. I like the way it's done in Pa. We still have the #1 product. People are going back to, top quality products and service.If you want that type of convience store quality David, then drive down south, and get what you pay for.
payson brickley
7:42 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Jim that's a crock, it's about bars and distributors making more money on items that should be competitive in the market place. You can't buy a six pack at a distributor?. Bars charge double the price because they have collusion on prices. There is a way around the "temperature" problem you point out. How do the six packs get to the bars? It's about greed
David Curran
5:26 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Jim, if you are having 4 couples over how many kegs would u purchase if people have varied taste? In my post I stated convience stores when I should have also included grocery stores. It's been my experience that if you buy a six of Corrona at Piggly Wiggly, it is the same quality as if u purchased a case at a distributer. I can honestly say I have not experienced your "hands on theory". What about our system are you
thrilled about; paying more?
ED ZACK
5:29 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Look at what happened to the price of booze in Washington after they went private, up ,up,up.
barbara rea
5:30 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Less government, more service and choice, get rid of pension obligations we cannot afford. We don't belong in the liquor business. babs
barbara rea
5:31 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Do not publish my full name
David Curran
5:44 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
To late Babs
Jim
5:55 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Then David, drive to one of the tri- state liquor stores and get every thing you need at the same price. Make sure you add in your gas, wear and tear on your car, and all the yuppie beer you and your friends can drink, that cost 12 dollars a six pack, in all 52 states. If your having four couples over, you should know in advance, what they drink, and have it on hand. If you buy a six pack at a piggly wiggly, it been handled at least four times more, then at any beer distributor, and is already gone thru more hot and cold spells, then my 85 year old grandmother. Good Beer distributors get thier beer straight from the brewers. Yes David, I will pay more, to somebody thats a U.S. citizen, and can give me first rate service. I like to get in and out,and I like to support American Citizens.
David Curran
6:24 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
I think you are wrong there Jim, if you purchase a case of imported beer, did it come directly from the brewer or from a third party ( handled more)? I would think an import company would also touch the product at some time.
Nevertheless, the current system in my mind is flawed, and should be changed.
I am going to just forget your implications that I am a bad host.
Cheers!
AL GREY JR
12:55 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Everybody is missing the point who are the buyers of these stores???? Gov. Tom Corbett's friends & all the people that gave him one million dollars or more to get elected! all state stores make a profit so if it's not broke why change it.
Why let the rich get richer only a well off person can buy one of these stores. Please go to Camden Nj & see what a private store really looks like see what it brings, just more crime all around it. Unions save jobs! Please go to China or read up on China with no unions, do you want to work for 12 hours for 36 dollars a day? Please people think the mob use to run the business now the are trying to get it back!
ron k
9:30 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
the PLCB is basically a private co. working in the Commonwealth, hiring employees through Civil Service. many of the employees are Veterans of the Armed Forces.
Contracts are Collectivelly Bargained, and the PLCB provides about 5000 family-sustaining jobs.
When the Commonwealth could not pass a budget some years ago, and Commonwealth employees were not getting paid, PLCB employees WERE getting paid. after all employees salaries, benefits, pensions are paid, the PLCB turns over $300-$500 million annually. all taxes are received at point of sale. many privatized states have liquor store in arrears on taxes.
who will benefit from privatization? walmart, bj's/sam's club. good luck getting wine/ liquor knowledge in one of those places.
Mom and pop shops will be few and far between because they will not be able to compete in pricing with the big boys.
payson brickley
7:31 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
The majority of people in this state want privatization. Corbett seems to have backed off on his commitment. Submit a referendum and let the people vote and be done with it. But that's too logical, and fair.
It's pathetic how antiquated and selfish this union and law is. Our system of gov. Is failing on the fed. and state levels. Politicians are insulated from the general public and do what they want.
ron k
9:37 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
the majority of the people in the state do not know the ramifications of privatization. you have been fed lies about better pricing and service.
with the staff being civil service employees, they have a disciplinary board to answer to for substandard service. if the stores were private, who can you complain to.
with the PLCB size, wine and spirit prices are bought at such bulk, a privatized system could not compete with pricing, it would actually go UP!
what should happen is, the Johnstown Flood tax should be eliminated. it is actually an unneeded tax that drives up the price on PLCB merchandise. that is still there because of greedy politicians.
and if this system goes private, there will be 5000 + new people on unemployment. talk about a burden on the commonwealth. people keep talking about there are no jobs, but keep pushing for eliminating existing jobs. have some forsight please!
Milton Bradley
11:25 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Jim
12:20 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
I have always found the state store employees very helpful. I travel a lot and depend on knowing where to find something. Pennslyvania state store employees have always saved me time and money. The price of any item in a Pa. state store, is the same as any store in Delaware, except Tri- State. It cost ten dollars to get there,unless your buying in bulk. The bigger state stores in Pa. have a better selection, then anybody, especially when it comes to fine wine. So APuck if you want good price. good service and a wide selection, stick with a well paid happy employee, who knows what thier doing, not some undocumanted counter person in Delaware, for the same price.
Hilarious.
Chris
2:56 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012
While a few of the wine specialty PA stores are much better, 90% of the stores have the same know-nothings you claim DE to have. And for every "specialty" store, I can find a Franks Union Wine Mart, Moore Bros, etc. in DE with people who could run circles around the specialty store wine clerks. Not to mention while being able to purchase the same bottle for a deeply discounted rate. PA has competed on price on some of the large scale vineyards, but they are not close at the specialty level.
Morgan King
11:01 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
I've lived in states with state-run liquor stores and privately-run liquor stores, and private-run ends up with vastly superior stores - retail and luxury commodities have no reason to be government controlled. I really hope that the privatization efforts can work with the union - I'd love to have everyone keep their jobs through the transition.
Lorraine
7:44 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012
I've had numerous problems with the liquor store in Media;
wrong order,
wrong amount,
not told when I will be shorted,
I've been given what the employees think is my order. I load it up, realize I'm short, and the employees want to inspect what I was loaded.
This is what no consequence for incompetence breeds.
I would appreciate the opportunity to take my business elsewhere.
Chris
2:46 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012
What a joke. You have the biggest popultation center of the state 20 minutes from both NJ and DE. Gee, I wonder if they really worry about the legality of crossing state lines when you can save $5 or more on a single bottle let alone large purchases. They are losing so much business to the other states it would more than make up for any potential loss of state revenue. Not to mention, do they think all these union people will lose their jobs? Really? Who do they believe the private stores going to hire???
ron k
4:10 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012
the jobs won't pay near the salary nor benefit package that exists now. but, what do ppl really care when they can save a buck. if the state got rid of the johnstown flood tax, it would knock off 18% of the purchase price and put them in the immediate price range of nj/del
Chris
12:02 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012
As a consumer I care about the product I purchase, its quality and its price. It is not my responsibility to be concerned with the wages that are paid or whether a service hires union or non union workers. As long as there are no crimes (e.g. sweat shops, underage workers, etc.) that's all that should matter. Since when did unionization become mandatory in this country. It amazes me how people will scream for free enterprise but only under certain conditions. The marketplace will take care of wages and benefits. Nobody forces anyone to work anywhere. People are free to seek jobs where they feel they are being paid fairly.
Barb's babble
5:28 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012
Whoever is running the store should be required to maintain a level of professionalism and competence. Wearing, what is close to pajamas and barely able to speak should not be permitted. I've met clerks who try and some who are even enthusiastic in providing service however gum chopping, PJ (or similar attire) wearing employees or possessing sour expressions are not professional. Reduces my confidence in anything they say. If unions want respect they need to appear and act with respect for themselves and customers.
Reasonable
1:23 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012
What is Milne's position? Answer who knows. Milne won't say. Democrats oppose this bill but Duane Milne won't give an answer on the day of the scheduled vote. I wonder if he is giving an answer to those primarily Republicans who want to take away good union jobs. Could we just get an answer from Milne?
Piaffe
8:51 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012
Some State store employees are helpful but private owners are service oriented. They also know their wines better. Private owners are more customer oriented whereas State employees are just that -- state employees. I also do not think the State that arrests DUIs ( and makes money from that) should also sell alcohol. Seems like the pusher is also benefiting financially from the arrests. I think the State needs to get out of the alcohol business so that expert owners can provide great information and great customer service. It seems to me there is a conflict of interest in selling liquor and then arresting on the other end. Double dipping. I say get out of the liquor business. And if a state employee is customer oriented hire that person in your private liquor shop.
Rich A
2:08 am on Friday, June 22, 2012
Going to the state store is like going to the DMV. Who here as been to the Wine and Spirits on Main Street? There is one elderly man there at checkout who clearly should not be employed with any customer facing responsibilities.